The UAW Bargaining Framework is a Gift to the Columbia Administration

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on print

After the Harvard administration caved to the graduate workers of HGSU in May 2018, the Columbia administration knew they’d lost the fight on bargaining with GWC-UAW.

Facing mounting anger from graduate workers, a national strike wave by educators, ongoing pressure from politicians, the recent unionization of CU postdocs, the impending contract renewal of the support staff union also in the UAW, and the credible threat of an indefinite strike by GWC, their options for further delay were dwindling. So why is UAW leadership staff trying to throw Lee Bollinger a 15-month lifeline?

Some essential background: like my union Barnard Contingent Faculty (BCF-UAW), Graduate Workers of Columbia (GWC-UAW) is a bargaining unit within the NYC-based UAW Local 2110, which is itself part of UAW Region 9A. Above them is the International UAW, headquartered in Detroit.

 

No Backroom Deals

 

From Detroit to Morningside Heights, all of us in the UAW share a commitment to fighting for workers, but history has shown that the strategies and ideologies of union bureaucracies do not always align with the those of rank-and-file workers. Working through these conflicts with clear transparency is essential to sustaining the strength and increasing the militancy of the labor movement. Which brings us to the proposed framework that UAW leadership staff are encouraging GWC rank-and-file workers to adopt.

The manner in which this proposed framework was negotiated is discrediting in itself. You cannot build worker power by intentionally locking workers out of negotiations with management, as appears to have been the case here. GWC has a democratically-elected Bargaining Committee, who are the only legitimate representatives of Columbia grad workers.

By going behind their backs, UAW staff have undercut this Committee’s authority. They have essentially sent the Columbia administration the signal that while the other side of the bargaining table may channel the anger, insights, and idealism of thousands of graduate workers, the real deals will be cut with union bureaucrats conditioned to settle faster and settle for less.

More distressingly, by conceding strike activity until April 2020, the proposed framework all but guarantees no meaningful progress on a contract will be made until the weeks before April 2020. Whether now or later, experience shows it will take a credible strike threat to get the Columbia administration to take bargaining seriously and assent to proposals that meaningfully address GWC’s bargaining goals.

Given the Columbia administration’s tenacious contempt for workers and its deep pockets, a union bargaining without a strike threat is bargaining from a position of weakness. Yes, the proposed framework would commit Columbia to “good faith” bargaining, but as I learned serving on a Bargaining Committee, the legal standard for “good faith” merely requires the employer to schedule regular meetings, offering proposals with micro concessions at the trivial edges of the workers’ demands. It does not require working towards achieving agreement. Columbia’s trained union busters will relish having 14 months of guaranteed strike-free bargaining to demean and dispirit the GWC Bargaining Committee with condescending rejections of their demands, insulting counter proposals that come in below the status quo, and a constant volley of slights and insults. And they will count on their UAW staff counterparts to encourage concessionary activity, significantly narrowing the bargaining agenda to Columbia’s advantage. That is to say, if GWC waits until April 2020 to strike, you’ll be striking for much, much less.

 

Bargaining from Weakness

 

Even dealing with the more pliant and less competent administration at Barnard, it quickly became clear after almost a year of fruitless negotiating, that the main job of our Bargaining Committee should have been to prepare our members for a strike from day one. All significant bargaining only happened after we set a strike deadline. Strike now or strike later. Strike now and strike later. Nothing in the proposed framework will obviate the need to recreate all of 2018’s strike organizing again in 2020. But forgoing 2018’s strike for so little in return (and taking striking off the table for so long) suggests to Columbia that the national UAW’s commitment to supporting a meaningful strike is low, and the administration’s chances of securing a more favorable contract are high.

The bottom line is that, if the proposed framework is adopted, the Columbia administration will simply have to meet its bare minimum legal obligation to bargain—where it was already ineluctably headed. GWC, on the other hand, will enter bargaining with a compromised Bargaining Committee that has already acquiesced to troublingly amorphous concessions over “academic and governance issues” and with no access for over a year to its most essential tool, the strike. And the real fight over a first contract is deferred until after cohorts of currently engaged activists have graduated.

This is all good news for Lee Bollinger. If the proposed framework is rejected and a strike commences, the union will have to explain repeatedly why it “walked away,” risking internal dissension, complicating its public messaging, and a loss of momentum. That is to say, even if the framework is rejected, the December strike may suffer the effects of this clumsy interference by union bureaucrats. Also not a bad outcome for Lee Bollinger. This is a self-inflicted wound upon labor organizing at our university by union bureaucrats who have lost touch.

 

EDITORS’ NOTE: This article was written prior to the membership vote that approved the framework agreement by 59%.  

Sonam Singh was a founding member of the Barnard adjunct union and served on the bargaining unit. He teaches Literature.

Read More

Photo of striking Columbia workers on the picket line
Columbia

Inside the Columbia Graduate Workers’ Strike

Four University of California graduate workers – who themselves went out on wildcat grading and teaching strikes in 2019-2020, and are now members of the Rank and File Action (RAFA-UC) caucus in the UC Student Workers’ Union (UAW-2865) – talked to members of C-AWDU to get a frank assessment of the dynamics at play, and some of the prehistory, of this ongoing, important strike.

Read More »
CUNY

Classroom Warfare at CUNY

A year ago, we were holding rallies across the university demanding pay equity for adjuncts, but today we are fighting for our very lives and our livelihoods. The crisis has only made those injustices worse, and only made the need for a rank-and-file class struggle union more necessary. This context has produced these five demands that are powering our movement.

Read More »
Covid

None of Us Are Getting Jobs: Notes on Organizing in the COVID University

The pandemic has dissolved the sustaining myth of grad school itself: that if you play along for long enough, you’ll get yours. The COVID crisis demands that we think bigger than a return for the “Golden Era” of universities, or concessions to extend the status quo. How do we want to imagine what the university could look like in the 21st century, after so many years of defunding and corporatization? If the crisis has introduced the certainty that the university will be transformed, how can we bend its potential toward a fundamental reversal of its long neoliberal course?

Read More »
Strategy

Time To Evict The Landlord University

Mass eviction from university housing in the coronavirus crisis has shown students what communities being gentrified have known for a long time: in most cities, the university is first and foremost a landlord. As student tenants, it’s up to us to organize towards collective actions that reflect the interlinked realities of work, tuition, debt, and rent.

Read More »
UC Santa Cruz

Dear President Napolitano: I Am a Wildcat Striker and We Will Win.

In late December 2019, graduate workers at UC Santa Cruz began a wildcat strike to secure a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA). In one of the most expensive housing markets in the US, graduate workers at UCSC are paid poverty wages, leaving many unable to afford basic necessities. The UC administration has responded brutally to the student action.

Read More »
University of California

The Roots of the UC Santa Cruz Wildcat Strike

The recent wildcat action at UC Santa Cruz arose out of a long history of organizing against concessionary contracts. Shannon Ikebe gives a history of the strikes in terms of the 2018 University of California contract.

Read More »
From the Archives

On the Fetishism of Bargaining

Gayle Rubin and Anne Bobroff distributed this essay in a pamphlet during a graduate student strike at the University of Michigan in 1975. In it, they argue that bargaining must be underwritten by strong rank-and-file power.

Read More »
CUNY

7k or Strike at CUNY

For years, CUNY’s two tier union system has colluded with public austerity to sell out adjuncts. A new militant movement has emerged to change that.

Read More »